Translate

Saturday, July 25, 2015

Corruption in Nigeria Under Obasanjo's Administration (1999-2007)


By: The News Magazine

Transcorp
President Obasanjo used his position to corner considerable shares of Transcorp, a blue chip company that was formed overnight to corner juicy contracts and make fat company acquisitions. It was incorporated in November 2004 and officially launched on 21 July 2005, at the Presidential Banquet Hall, State House, Abuja, with Obasanjo as the special guest of honour.

The Transcorp matter was so serious that Chief Gani Fawehinmi, the human rights lawyer, dragged the former president to the Code of Conduct Bureau. He wanted Obasanjo tried over the activities of Transcorp and his shareholding in the company seized or forfeited to the federal government as provided for under item 18(2)c of the Code of Conduct for public officers contained in the fifth schedule, part 1 of the 1999 Constitution.
Fawehinmi lamented that during its formal launch on Thursday 21 July 2005, Obasanjo announced some concessions to the corporation as part of government support and encouragement.

These include: Licence to build a 400,000-barrel per day refinery, licence to build an independent power plant, access to the federal government cassava project for the construction of cassava processing exports facility, designed land mass for the construction of free port facilities, continued support to help open up market on the African continent and to make Transcorp a partner in Nigeria’s current policy on private/public partnership, creating additional opportunities to develop large scale projects in oil and gas, power and information and communications technology, ICT.

As Fawehinmi put it, the company acquired three prime business interests from Nigeria: four oil blocks, OPL218, 219, 209 and 220 allocated to it on 21 July 2005 by Obasanjo when it was launched; Nicon-Hilton, Abuja in October 2005 for $105million and NITEL on 3 July 2006 for $750million.
The lawyer noted that the Director-General of the Nigerian Stock Exchange, NSE, and Chairman of Transcorp, Dr. Ndi Okereke-Onyiuke, admitted before the House of Representatives that the former president is a subscriber to Transcorp through Obasanjo Holdings Limited.

He added that, the admission by the Trustees–Elder Daniel Atsu and Barrister Lucky Egede–of Obasanjo Holdings Limited compounds the constitutional illegality of the ex-president’s involvement in Transcorp. Obasanjo Holdings Limited, the lawyer maintained, is the nominee of President Olusegun Obasanjo in Transcorp and acts on behalf of the president as a cover.

He argued: “for the president to allocate oil fields or blocs as the Minister of Petroleum Resources to Transcorp, a company in which he has substantial shares, is clearly an abuse of office contrary to section 15(5) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 which provides that, “the state shall abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power.”

The former president used his influence to sway the purchase of NITEL and Nicon-Hilton Hotel in favour of Transcorp, a practice which Fawehinmi regarded as “a corrupt act and violation of the code of conduct.”

The Presidential Library
When Obasanjo launched his N7 billion library project, government contractors, banks, businessmen, governors, government functionaries and hangers-on fell over one another to donate N4 billion, while the oil majors operating in Nigeria put in US$20 million. Those who donated were a consortium of banks – N622million; 36 state governors – N360million; MikeAdenuga-N250million; Aliko Dangote and friends- N200million; Femi Otedola- N200million; Nigerian Ports Authority, NPA community- US$1million; Ogun State governor-N100million; Obasanjo Holdings- N100million; Sunny Odogwu-N100million; Arisekola Alao-N100million etc.

Also, Fawehinmi took Obasanjo to court, saying that he abused his office and violated the constitution because, the presence of the big donors meant he used his office to “force” out the money from the corporate organisations and those seeking one favour or the other.

Excess Crude Account
When he was in power, Obasanjo withdrew N2.1billion from the excess crude oil funds. That was in March 2006, when he explained that he wanted to use the money to supplement the cost of the extension of the national census. However, the former Nigerian leader failed or refused to inform the National Assembly or those who elected him into power for almost three months.

It was only after the Senate Committee on Finance and Appropriation began to turn its gaze in that direction that Obasanjo wrote a letter to the House of Representatives, claiming $17,290,067 (about N2.1 billion) was withdrawn after he had convened an emergency meeting of the stakeholders–some state governors and the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission members.

However, analysts maintained that Section 80(3) of the 1999 Constitution states that no monies shall be withdrawn from any public fund of the federation, “unless the issue of those money has been authorised–not by governors or stakeholders–by an Act of the National Assembly.”

Petroleum Trust Development Fund, PTDF
Obasanjo was the first to stir the hornets’ net on this matter when he accused Vice President Atiku Abubakar of corrupt enrichment. According to the EFCC document which Obasanjo dangled with glee, Atiku was alleged to have diverted a sum of $125 million approved for the operation of the PTDF to the Equatorial Trust Bank, owned by Otunba Mike Adenuga, and Trans International Bank, TIB, which, thereafter, gave N400 million to MOFAS Shipping Company, owned by Otunba Oyewole Fasawe. EFCC also connected Adenuga’s payment of $20 million for his Globacom licence to PTDF money lodged in his bank.

From October 2003, according to the document, MOFAS paid more than N500 million to Umar Pariya, Personal Assistant to the former Vice-President, while N61 million was paid by the company directly to Atiku and N60 million directly to Musa Garba, a contractor who works for Atiku’s ABTI American University. Atiku responded with a ballistic missile that threw Obasanjo off his perch. Speaking through his media aide, Garba Shehu, Atiku said that Obasanjo, his family, businesses, native community and the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, benefited from the PTDF money.

He revealed that Bodunde Adeyanju, Obasanjo’s Personal Assistant, made over 100 visits to TIB, Abuja, located at Tofa House in the Central Business District, between 1999 and 2004. “The truth of the matter is that there is a big linkage between Chief Obasanjo and Otunba Fasawe, contrary to the claims that the President has made.

There are cheques worth over N100 million issued to IBAD Nigeria Limited, a construction company solely owned by Obasanjo, from Fasawe’s MOFAS TIB accounts,” Garba revealed.
Shehu charged further that Fasawe made some direct payments to Obasanjo’s Africa Leadership Forum, ALF, and to the Obasanjo Campaign Organisation. “Also, a TIB Abuja branch cheque of N4 million was issued to Ibogun-Olaogun Development Association on 26th February, 2004. Ibogun-Olaogun is Obasanjo’s village,” Garba added for effect.

Garba spilled the beans further, claiming that from 1999 to the elections in 2003, Adeyanju, on behalf of Obasanjo, collected over N3 billion from MOFAS account at TIB, Abuja branch. Atiku further revealed to the Senate Committee on the Fund how Obasanjo paid a staggering N250 million of PTDF money to a lawyer to register a company, Galaxy Backbone.

NNPC Funds
Like a possessive, jealous husband, Obasanjo clung to the Ministry of Petroleum Resources under which is the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC. Chief Audu Ogbeh once told TheNEWS: “I was National Chairman of PDP for over three years. I was also honorary Special Adviser on Agriculture.
I know and I was told by many ministers that President Obasanjo did not for once bring any memo for the award of oil bloc or contract in the petroleum sector to council.”

Obasanjo, through his Chief of Staff, General Abdullahi Mohammed (retd.), allegedly used the NNPC to unilaterally award contracts without regard to tender or competitive bidding. As reported by this magazine in the past, Mohammed, in a letter entitled, “Request for Revalidation of Approval for NNPC funding on the Nigerian Navy” and dated 18 August 2006, merely stated the importance of procurement of spare parts for the Navy and Obasanjo directed NNPC to award the contract.

Ten days later, Mohammed approved a contract for the local refit of NN ships and procurement of spare parts at the cost of N4.63 billion.
Obasanjo also wrote a letter to the then Group Managing Director, NNPC, Engineer Funso Kupolokun, asking the corporation to fund the training of 50 individuals and establish media and operational centres in Abuja, Warri and Port Harcourt for N1.19 billion.

This lack of due process also manifested in the award of contracts handled by Kinetic Ltd., which supplied 193 Cobra Armoured vehicles for the Nigerian Army at the cost of $35.7 million and was paid through Bankers Guarantee No. 550-0-0446905 with Invoice No. STK/2007/088B.
This contract was fixed in January 2007 by the former Chief of Army Staff, Major-General Owoye Azazi, on behalf of the Federal Government. Singapore Kinetics was, through the NNPC, given an “advance payment”of $35.7million.

Falana, in his suit, alleged that from 1999 to 2007, Obasanjo had withdrawn over N1trillion unauthorised and un-appropriated by the National Assembly, from the NNPC account and the Federation Account.

A New Revenue Arrangement
At the height of his civilian dictatorship, Obasanjo whimsically altered the revenue allocation arrangement so much that the 36 state governors, including those in his party, PDP, filed a suit at the Supreme Court against him on 16 September 2002. They alleged that Obasanjo acted unconstitutionally by coming up with a new revenue formula without the approval of the National Assembly.

Two months earlier, Obasanjo approved a controversial amendment to the Revenue Allocation Act, giving 54.68 per cent, instead of 56 per cent, while the state governments and local governments received 24.72 per cent and 20.60 per cent instead of 24 and 20 per cent respectively. The Governors charged: “The modification order issued by the president is a violation of the judgment of the Supreme Court.”

Money Given To Ghana
Obasanjo, in July, 2004, whimsically granted Ghana and the Republic of Sao Tome and Principe $45 million loans. It was after questions were raised that he rushed to the National Assembly. Ghana’s share of $40 million was to help it complete its part of financing of the West African Gas project while the remaining $5 million was to enable Sao Tome and Principe tackle some immediate problems.

Other Withdrawals
On 9 September 2005, Obasanjo wrote a letter to the Senate, requesting approval to withdraw $2.4billion from the account as the government’s counterpart fund for the Power Sector Development Scheme, PSDS, and $12.4 billion to offset Nigeria’s debt to the Paris Club. Although the Senate approved the $12.4 billion to settle the balance of the debt owed the Paris Club, it resolved that this was possible after it had been appropriated by relevant authority as required by law.

But Obasanjo withdrew the $12.4 billion from the Federation Account, instead of the Consolidated Revenue Fund Account, which the upper legislative chamber recommended, and he also took $2.4 billion PSDS fund without waiting for the approval of the relevant authorities.

That time, Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Public Finance and Appropriation, Farouk Lawan, argued that Obasanjo’s action was illegal. He wondered why, for instance, Obasanjo’s “request for fund outside the Appropriation Act was never brought to the National Assembly for consideration and possible approval.”

Nigeria Sao-Tome and Principe Joint Development Authority, JDA
The JDA was formally inaugurated in January 2002 to explore crude oil in the Gulf of Guinea and the strait between Nigeria and Sao Tome and Principe. According to the treaty, which would last for 45 years, with a review due after 30 years, 60 per cent of resources would be for Nigeria, while 40 per cent would be for Sao Tomé and Principe.

But the Obasanjo government changed the goalpost in the middle of the match just one year after this treaty, a development that soured the relationship between the two countries.
Trouble started after the 2003 first licensing round, FLR, of oil bloc awards. In 2005, the Sao Tome Attorney-General, Adelino Pereira, investigated an allegation raised by a United States of America-based major oil company on certain shady deals it said characterised the FLR awards by the JDA. The investigations were backed by the World Bank and Dobie Langenkamp, a professor of Energy at the University of Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

According to TheNEWS’ earlier report, the protesting oil company bid substantially higher than the Nigerian companies that were eventually awarded concession.
“But alleged political manipulation and certain option rights to Environmental Remediation Holding Corporation, ERHC, the major beneficiary of the awards, frustrated the US firm to abandon the cause even though it was far more qualified and possesses the requisite financial, technical and managerial capabilities to handle the lead operations in the JDZ than the favoured companies.”

EHRC is owned by Chief Emeka Offor, a controversial politician and friend to Obasanjo. Other figures close to Obasanjo were fingered as beneficiaries of the award: Chief Anthony Anenih, now Nigerian Ports Authority chairman, who owns controlling shares in A & Harmattan Ltd., which won oil bloc 2; Godsonic Incorporated Oil and Gas, which succeeded in bloc 4; Aliko Dangote clinched bloc 3 through his company, DEER. So also did Mike Adenuga, whose Conoil won in bloc 4.

“Kema Chikwe, former Aviation Minister,” this magazine wrote, “is believed to have recruited Hope Uzodinma, an Obasanjo crony–who was recently arrested by the Economic and Financial Commission over an alleged scam–to float Filtzim-Huzod Oil and gas. The company, registered in the Cayman Islands, was yet another beneficiary, as was Sahara Energy, owned by Tonye Cole, son of Dr. Patrick Dele Cole, a former Special Adviser to Obasanjo…”

Apart from lack of a geological or petroleum engineering academic or professional expertise, the companies, as the Sao Tome government alleged, “equally lack the financial guarantee to actualise operation.” The Sao Tome AG’s office alleged further: “The procedures used to select the companies which received concessions contained serious flaws and did not satisfy the minimum standards required for the award of such licences.” The report views the Nigerian-owned companies awarded exploration rights as emergency “investment vehicles of financial speculators with no track record of achievement in oil producing or exploration.” Also regulatory documents published in the USA, where ERHC is domiciled, described Offor’s company as “little more than a paper company with no operations and just one favourable contract in its portfolio.”

The Odi Massacre
Odi, a town on the bank of the famous River Nun, popularised in one of Gabriel Okara’s poems, has a population of over 60,000. The inhabitants engage in fishing, farming, harvesting and processing of oil palm produce and trading. And it is a host community for Shell Petroleum Development Company, which controls three oil wells there. Early in November, 1999, some youths abducted and killed 14 policemen. Thereafter, Obasanjo issued a 14-day ultimatum to the government of Bayelsa State to produce the killers or he, Obasanjo, would proclaim a state of emergency.

Before the expiration of this ultimatum, however, Obasanjo ordered troops into Odi and the surrounding villages. The soldiers cordoned off the East-West Road by the Orashi River at Mbiama and by the River Niger at Patani, after which they began a major military operation with the use of heavy artillery, aircraft, grenade launchers, mortar bombs and other sophisticated weapons.

According to the Civil Liberties Organisation, a human rights non-governmental organisation, which visited the area after, “So ruthless, savage and thorough was the operation that it could only have been intended to achieve a genocidal outcome.” CLO added that two weeks after the operation, the stench of decomposing bodies dumped into various creeks could still be perceived one kilometre from the town. And every house in the entire community, with the exception of the First Bank, a Community Health Centre and the Anglican Church, were burnt down.

But the Obasanjo government defended itself. The invasion, code-named Operation Hakuri II by the then Minister of Defence, General T.Y. Danjuma, was “initiated with the mandate of protecting lives and property–particularly oil platforms, flow stations, operating rig terminals and pipelines refineries and power installation in the Niger Delta.”

The Zaki Biam Killings
Between Monday, 22 October and Wednesday October 24, 2001, Obasanjo unleashed similar mayhem on Zaki Biam, Vaase, Agbayin, Gbeji and Sankara in Benue State for the same reason–alleged murder of some soldiers. Amnesty International said: “The government of Nigeria must…condemn the killings publicly and make it clear that those responsible will be held accountable.” But Obasanjo told the Financial Times, on 9 April 2002, that when you send in soldiers, “they do not go on a picnic”, adding that “in human nature, reaction is always more than the action.”

Loans for Obasanjo Farms Limited
Obasanjo’s transformation in this area is spectacular. Since its establishment in 1978, Obasanjo’s farm was surviving on shoe string but when he became President, the story changed. Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, a former Special Assistant to the President on Public Communications and one time Minister supervising the Ministry of Aviation, revealed that the former president’s farm was chalking in an average of N30 million a month or N360 million per year.

When the former president and Atiku were engaged in a political brawl, going for each other’s balls, the Atiku Campaign Organisation raised the challenge that Obasanjo should tell Nigerians how he could transform his farm, which was going under in 1999, to a multi-billion naira business octopus in 2007.
The former Nigerian leader had only N20,000 in his bank account before he was voted into power, according to Malam Nasir el-Rufai, former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory. But Obasanjo’s spokesman, Uba Sani, said his principal raised a N2 billion loan for the farm.

However, Atiku’s foot soldiers replied, asking Sani to tell that to the marines. They argued: “The explanation of Uba Sani has only further exposed the duplicity of General Obasanjo.
General Obasanjo should tell Nigerians how a farm, which was moribund in 1999 and had to be bailed out of impending liquidation, became so rich to generate the collateral for a N2 billion loan.”

They maintained that one needs a collateral of about N6 billion to raise a N2 billion loan. Obasanjo, in their words, “should tell Nigerians how he transformed from a man, who his closest minister said had less than N20, 000 in his account in 1999, to someone who now has N6 billion collateral to take a N2 billion loan.”
Atiku’s people threw the poser: “Nigerians will be glad to know if President Obasanjo solely took a N2 billion loan from the N50 billion agriculture fund facilitated by the Federal Government when there are millions of Nigerian farmers who should access the loan, but have been crying for access since the introduction of the loan.
If President Obasanjo collected N2 billion from a N50 billion agriculture fund approved by his government, does this portend conflict of interest or corruption? These are the questions President Obasanjo should answer to rescue his sagging integrity.”

Obasanjo as Land Grabber
Obasanjo laid foundation for this when, as a military head of state, he promulgated the Land Use Decree in 1978, vesting the ownership of land in the federal and state governments. Through that, Obasanjo dispossessed the people of Akpa in Badagry, Lagos State, for the building of Bells University. A protest by the villagers was crushed by the former president’s soldiers. The same treatment awaited the people of Lekitaba and Gembu towns on the Mambilla Plateau.

They were beaten up by policemen when they stood up against what their enlightened sons called “the Savannah leg of the expanding Obasanjo Farm.” The people of Ishasi-Akute in Ogun State and Ayetoro Itele via Ayobo in Lagos State were also given the same dose of medicine. The rest of the community went wild, almost creating another Agbekoya that OBJ went soft, saying in Yoruba: Oto l’eto, oto le’to (legal and backdoor processes are different).

People of Awela near Ayetoro also lost 500 hectares of land to OBJ over 12 years ago. And in 2002, the former president acquired 250 hectares at Ajoda for teak cultivation. The former Nigerian leader turned the people of Abela, near Abeokuta, against their leaders over land.
As this magazine reported in 2007, the people complained: “He didn’t buy the land from us properly. What he did was to meet the heads of families who owned the land and give them some paltry sums before he took over the land.”

Alhaji Yusuf told TheNEWS in January 2005 that Obasanjo used his status to “give us what he likes; the family members are fighting one another instead of the land grabber himself.” Close to Iseyin, Oyo State, Jim Shina Farms offered a N250 million lease to Obasanjo’s farm for 50 years. For good measure, he made it possible that an abandoned Federal Government dam be resuscitated in order to turn this farm into the Garden of Eden.

In Cross River state, the story is not different. In 2001, Obasanjo acquired 10,000 hectares from the immediate past Governor Donald Duke for oil palm estate. Also, the retired general secured an additional 5,000 hectares at Kwa Plantation and took over the government oil palm nursery in Ochong.

“When this thing started some few years ago, Obasanjo was coming here regularly,” Goddy Akpama, National Democratic Party, NDP, Publicity Secretary, once lamented to TheNEWS. He added: “We all thought he was doing this anti-deforestation campaign. Later we heard rumours that he was coming to take over the forest and all that.”

Obasanjo’s over 100 square kilometres of land spread across nine communities in Akampa and Akpambuyi local government areas of the state. At a point, youths from Abiati, Mfamosing, Aningafe, Mbobui, Ndigane, Akonganaku and Akira Ikot, all in Akampa Local Government Area, as well as Effanga Ikot and Oyom Eneyo, challenged the former president, a development that led to the victimisation of Chief Daniel Asuquo, the chairman of Akampa Council.

He lost his re-election and spent 18 months in detention on a spurious murder charge, which the court threw out in 2004. Since 2000, this magazine gathered, Obasanjo’s oil palm mill on his plantation, under the supervision of one Gilbert, a Malaysian, has been producing 10 tonnes of palm oil per day.
Obasanjo poached a majority of the mill workers from the Nigerian Institute for Oil Palm Research, NIFOR, Evborneka in Edo State. He accommodates them at Kwa Housing Estate, a former property of Calabar Sports Club on Ekorenium Road.

In Rivers State, Obasanjo’s oil palm land is located at Ehuagie in Ogbo/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Area. His two fish farms are at Ota Ahoada and Ogbo communities. He has other choice parcels of land at Omuotude area. Analysts, however, are anxious whether President Umar Yar’Adua’s plan to review the Land Use Act will affect the former Nigerian leader.

Unethical Agribusiness Practice
Before becoming president, Obasanjo leased out his Abeokuta Owiwi Commercial Hatchery because it was almost going under. An Israeli farm, Agrited, took over his farm at Oluyole Local Government in Ibadan. From 1993 to 2004, Avian Specialities was in charge of Obasanjo’s poultry at Alomaja in Ibadan.
But with a combination of greed, laws designed to favour his farm at the expense of others and other underhand tactics, Obasanjo gained a slow but steady monopoly that caught his competitors panting like a beached whale.

It all started on Saturday 24 November 2004 when the management of Zartech Nigeria Limited, an agribusiness company, unwittingly invited a goat to come and inspect its barn of cocoyam! In other words, the company gave Obasanjo the honour to unveil its Tunnel Ventilation houses, a new production system. As the ceremony was going on, the former president’s mind was somewhere else.

Something was taking shape in his head. He shunned the lunch with Maurice Zard, chairman of the company and skittered to his Otta farm where he lambasted his own officials for allowing the other company to outperform them.

Then Obasanjo started laying his snare, first by persuading the Poultry Stakeholders Council, at a meeting, that importation of grandparent stock, a better breed of chicken, be controlled. In their communiqué, the following companies came up for licence: Zartech Nigeria Limited, Avian Specialities, Tuns Farms, Oshogbo; Obasanjo Farms, Otta; Nirrya Farms, Kaduna and S & D.

However, while the stakeholders had their say, Obasanjo had his way. He jettisoned their list and came up with four companies: Obasanjo Farms, S & D Farms, owned by his chum, Femi Coker; CHI Farms, producers of Chivita and the National Animal Production Institute, Shika, Zaria. The stakeholders did not have any stake in the new scheme!

Those who had the wherewithal were not given the opportunity while weak ones had a field day. Zartech, the biggest farm in Nigeria, with the capacity to slaughter 20,000 chickens per day, was inexplicably denied the licence. The new arrangement was such that weaker farms would supply big players with grand parent stock.
When the stakeholders complained to the former Agriculture Minister, Alhaji Adamu Bello, he threw his hands up in frustration. Not a company to give up easily, Zartech seized the opportunity of the inability of the National Animal Production Research Institute, NAPRI, to finance what was approved for it to import. Zartech expressed its readiness to provide the money. But when Obasanjo got wind of this, his security goons arrested Zartech’s Managing Director, Roger Adjaude and his brother, Tony, and deported them to Lebanon, their country. Dr. A Oni, NAPRI boss was also detained.

Obasanjo went further to make it a crime for any foreign airline to freight the grandparent stocks to Nigeria without approval from Aso Rock. They chickened out because they knew that the former president was a mean and jealous chicken farmer. Obasanjo went a step further to make sure the stocks were intercepted at the border.

With the coast clear, other farms, since then, have been buying grandparent stocks from Obasanjo’s farm. Obasanjo’s hatred for Zartech manifested when he tried to persuade the United African Company, UAC, not to lease its farm in Maya, Oyo State to it. But UAC stood its ground. Worse still, he accused Agrited of lowering prices, a practice which Obasanjo himself was guilty of. For this, his soldiers drove away the Israelis from the farm he leased to them.

Hurried Terminal Contracts
On 16 May, 13 days to the end of his tenure, Obasanjo announced to the Federal Executive Council, FEC, the award of contracts worth N756 billion. That proposal sailed through the council like a greased pig in a slaughter house. As Frank Nweke, then minister of Information, explained, N70 billion of this would be for the resuscitation of textile industries in Nigeria; N58.6 billion for the second Niger Bridge; its maintenance was to gulp N42 billion. The companies to execute the projects were not named. Three days earlier, FEC, approved N16.53 billion port harbours reconstruction in Lagos; N20 billion, expansion of the Lagos airport; N4.8 billion, building of the Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, permanent accommodation; and N1.39 billion for the Ministry of Defence’s permanent residence for participants of War College Training Course in Abuja; N1.4 billion, conversion of steam and head for the power plants; N47.4 billion, conversion of the Alaoji Power Plant to double circuit; N3.5 billion for procurement and repair of two boilers at the Egbin Power Station in Lagos and N233 million was for fixing the Agege-Lagos Road.

Professor Daniel Saror, former Minority Leader of the Senate, told TheNEWS in 2007: “Obasanjo was dipping his hand into the Federation Account to execute many projects, including the power stations in the Niger Delta. Billions of dollars are being spent on those projects without the approval of the relevant agencies. No senator can exercise oversight function over them because nobody at the National Assembly knows about the contracts and the companies handling them.

Senator Farouk Bello Bunza had tried to draw the attention of the Senate to this anomaly, but the PDP senators shot his motion down.”
If the above contracts were rubber stamped by the FEC, it was not aware of when Malam Muhammad Habibu Aliyu, then Minister of State for Water Transportation, awarded $140 million worth of contracts for the protection of the Lagos coastline and N2.3 billion for a river port in Lokoja.

The FEC neither revealed the contractor nor how the money would be raised. Worse still, Obasanjo awarded a N22 billion contract for the dualisation of the East/West Road without going through competitive tender. Others were the Oron-Eket Road awarded for N26.6 billion; Eket-Onne section, N29.4 billion; Onne-Kaiama section, N86 billion, Kaiama-Warri Road, N78 billion.

There were also the N30.3 billion contract for the building of a dam at Karhia, a suburb of the Federal Capital Territory; dualisation of Jikwoyi-Karshi Road, N7 billion; redevelopment of the popular A.Y.A. area N1.5 billion; surveying and mapping of the FCT, N162.8 million; construction of Abuja Children Resort Library, N130 million; construction of comprehensive health centres in the 774 local government areas across the country, N55 billion. The Millennium Development Goals, MDGs, fund for the development of the agricultural sector was to gulp N15 billion and replacement of dilapidated infrastructure in the education sector, N600 billion.

He also committed N21.2 billion for the development of the Middle Rima Valley Irrigation Project II in Sokoto; rehabilitation of Sokoto-Talata Mafara-Gusau Road was reviewed upward to N4 billion; renovation of the Jigawa Polytechnic, N156 million; provision of amenities in border communities around the Nigeria/Niger Republic in Katsina State, N800 million.

Dr. Joseph Wayas, Second Republic Senate President, was quoted by a medium: “It was wrong of Obasanjo to award contracts at a stage when he should be preparing his handover notes. Why should you sit for eight years only to start awarding contracts for somebody else to supervise? What is your interest in those contracts? Who do Nigerians hold accountable for the success or failure of those contracts?”

Although Frank Nweke, then Minister of Information, argued they were in order, because government is a continuum, analysts wondered that it was the same Obasanjo who, in 1999, set up the Christopher Kolade Panel to probe all transactions of the General Abudusalami Abubakar government.

Siemens
During a news conference last year, acting U.S. Assistant Attorney-General, Matthew Friedrich, announced that German company, Siemens AG, pleaded guilty to Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations, one of which was bribery scandal against some Nigerian big shots. President Umar Yar’Adua, penultimate Sunday, directed all relevant security agencies to investigate it.

A statement, signed by the President’s Special Adviser on Communications, Olusegun Adeniyi, read: “The attention of President Umaru Yar’Adua has been drawn to media reports of the alleged bribery by an international telecoms company (Siemens) of some past Nigerian public officials and the President wishes to assure the nation that anybody found culpable in the scandal would face the full wrath of the law.”
Although Lori Weinstein, the dogged prosecutor, who pursued the case, did not reveal the names to Judge Richard Leon, she said the documents contained clues for the court to figure out who was who in the $4.5 million bribery scam over $130 million telecommunications projects between 2000 and 2001. Yar’Adua’s investigation may unravel who accepted $180,000 wristwatches.

Halliburton Bribes
The Umar Yar’Adua government, according to analysts, should probe Obasanjo and Atiku over the Halliburton scam. It was the former Nigerian leader who started it all when he mentioned his former VP in the scandal during the controversial BBC interview. Atiku’s media aide, Garba Shehu, however, countered: “Obasanjo had said these and many more while he was in office.

Yet, with all the law enforcement agencies at his disposal, he failed to establish a single case against Atiku. The scandal broke out after a French court investigated Kellog, Brown and Root, KBR, a Halliburton subsidiary, on an allegation that it paid $180m to FG officials to win contracts for the construction of the $6 billion NLNG plant. For this, Halliburton pleaded guilty and agreed to pay a fine of $579 million.

According to documents on the website of the US Justice Department, Tri-Star, based in Gribraltar, and a trading company of Tokyo were respectively paid $132 million and $50 million to be passed to Nigerian officials. The EFCC, which once probed the $180m bribe scandal, interrogated Edmund Daokuru, former Minister of State in the Petroleum Ministry, and Funso Kupolokun, then the Group Managing Director, NNPC.

The scam started from the General Sani Abacha years–Alhaji M.D. Yusuf and former oil minister, Dan Etete were named–and continued under Abdulsalami. Under Obasanjo, Halliburton twice paid kickbacks–in 2001, $51 million and in 2002, $37.5 million.

In its 29 March, edition, Next on Sunday reported that after the “transition to civil rule in 1999, the United States Department of Justice attorneys stated that (Albert Jackson Mr.Stanley, Chief Executive of KBR) met with the new President, Olusegun Obasanjo and the then Group Managing Director of NNPC, Gauis Obaseki, in Abuja on November 11, 2001, to designate ‘a representative with whom the joint venture… should negotiate the (obligatory) bribes in support of the award of the (forthcoming) Trains 4 and 5 contracts.” Mr. Wojciech Chodan, an American but UK-based wheeler dealer and Mr.Stanley, as the newspaper put it, met Obaseki over lunch, “to discuss the details of the Trains 4 and 5 contracts.”

Violation of Court Orders/Constitution
The one that readily comes to mind was the way Obasanjo seized the funds of Lagos State councils, in spite of the Supreme Court ruling. Jide Ayobolu, a public commentator, once lamented “a situation where those that swore on oath to uphold the constitution, are wantonly violating the constitution.”

Bells University
As President, Obasanjo awarded licence for himself to establish a private university, Bells. This is in spite of what is contained in the statute books that a serving president should not engage in any business except agriculture. Analysts argued that it was for this reason that the former president victimised former Abia State governor, Orji Kalu, whose Slok Airline had to relocate to Gambia.

Though supporters of Obasanjo claimed that he ran his companies through blind trusts, but watchers of the government are of the view that he used his influence to the advantage of such ventures.

Oil Deals
As petroleum minister, Obasanjo did not account for oil sales. For this reason and more, Femi Falana, the human rights lawyer, dragged the former president to a Federal High Court, Abuja. Falana charged that between 2000 and 2006, Nigeria lost over $13 billion unaccounted revenue. “A thorough investigation will crack the secrecy and reveal the wanton billions of dollars that had vanished from the sales book,” Falana maintained.

He also wants the court to question OBJ on how he spent over $1billion between 1999 and 2006 for the rehabilitation of the Port Harcourt and Kaduna refineries, all of which are not working. “On this score, we have since confirmed that more than $700million was misappropriated to enrich Chief Olusegun Obasanjo and his cronies and to fund his political party, the People Democratic Party, PDP,” Falana alleged, adding that in the end Obasanjo sold off the refineries as scraps.

A can of worms was opened by Hamman Tukur, Chairman Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) when he called President Umaru Musa Yar’ Adua in August 2007.
According to Mathias Okoi-Uyouyo, in his book, EFCC and the New Imperialism, A study of Corruption in the Obasanjo Years, “Tukur who almost bit the dust in the dying days of the Obasanjo administration (due to his campaigns for probity in governance), told Yar’Adua that the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) had withheld a total sum of N560 billion from the Federation Account from December 2004 to April 2007.”
Tukur, as the writer puts it, revealed that NNPC lifts 445,000 barrels of crude oil every day for domestic refining but it sells most of these to refineries outside the country, especially because our refineries are not operating at full capacity.

The NNPC pays for refining and collects all the refined products but Nigeria and collects all the refined products but Nigerians only see kerosene, PMS and diesel. “Revenue from the sale of the other LFPO should be enough to recover costs and save Nigerians from price increase. (However,) the NNPC does not account for the other products but it also withholds about N20billion every month from the Federation Account as subsidy.”

The critic maintained further that there is also the need to question the rationale of the NNPC being supplied 450,000 barrels of crude oil a day when the refineries when functioning at full capacity can only refine 300,000 barrels a day. The refining capacity of the refineries during the period under review has further plunged to 150,000 barrels per day from 250,000 barrels per day in 1999, yet 450,000 barrels were daily supplied to it.

In his calculation, Okoi-Uyouyo said that in 2001, when the local allocation was increased, crude oil was selling at N35per barrel in the international market. “The price NNPC was paying is $18 per barrel for an excess 300,000 barrels it could not refine. A profit of $5,100,000 was earned daily from this transaction. The crude oil was paid for in naira by the NNPC.

The organisation paid the Central Bank of Nigeria at N110 to a dollar, when the existing rate of the dollar in the foreign exchange market was N135 to a dollar.” The book further tells Nigerians that revelation by NEITI on an audit carried on its behalf by the United Kingdom-based audit firm, Hart Group, showed that about 65million barrels of crude oil sold between 1999 and 2004 could not be accounted for.”

Privatisation of State-Owned Enterprises
According to a survey contained in Mathias Okoi-Uyonyo’s book, EFCC and the New Imperialism, the Privatisation programme under Obasanjo was implemented in a “manner that handed over these public assets at ridiculously low prices to people alleged to be his business associates or that of his family members. Typical examples were his Nigerian Telecommunications and Ajaokuta Steel Complex.” On NITEL, Falana has an axe to grind with OBJ.

The Investors International Limited, ILL, of London is, as the lawyer explained, owned by Chief Olusegun Obasanjo’s cronies and was “induced into buying up NITEL”. First Bank, therefore, as the lawyer said, lent $100million to ILL, which the company paid as part of the required 10 per cent deposit to Bureau of Public Enterprises, BPE, in lieu of NITEL shares. Questions were raised on the loan because it breached the Bank and Other Financial Institution Act, BOFIA, 1991, which states that no bank can give a loan to a single client in excess of 35 per cent of the value of its shareholders’ fund.

But Obasanjo, as Falana alleged, withdrew $100 million from the Federation Account without appropriation by the National Assembly to offset NITEL’s indebtedness to the bank, just before the auction took place. Obasanjo also has questions to answer on the Aluminum Smelter Company of Nigeria, ALSCON, Ajaokuta Steel Company, Hilton Hotel, NICON Insurance plc, Federal Government houses and others.
For Obasanjo, therefore, to say to the international community that he is clean, analysts conclude, he was playing the ostrich. To them, his backside is exposed to the wind, desert wind!


Culled from: Executive Watchdog                                              Source: The News Magazine

Monday, June 1, 2015

Who Will Checkmate APC?

29TH May, 2015

By: Amir Abdulazeez

T
he All Progressives’ Congress (APC) is now Nigeria’s official ‘ruling’, sorry ‘governing’ party; recall, Buhari said they were going to govern not rule. Despite now being the party in power at the centre and in control of a little less than two-third of the states of the federation, APC is arguably still not the dominant party in the country, especially when we compare its current status with what PDP was in 2003 and 2007.

Some of the reasons why APC may not be considered as dominant as PDP was include; it is not in absolute control of the National Assembly where it slightly lacks the two-third majority in the House of Representatives and only has a slim majority in the Senate. APC will be facing the PDP as the most potentially strong and richest opposition party in Nigeria’s history. The party had ruled for 16 years and it will take a reasonably long time before its material wealth (something that is indispensable in Nigerian politics) and long-term influence gained in power to completely wither away. The PDP is also controlling some of the richest and most important states in Nigeria with Kano and Lagos being the most significant exception, apart from having some of Nigeria’s most valuable political maestros within its fold. Furthermore, PDP’s strong ward to national political structure across the country built over the years with power, wealth and patronage cannot be easily dismantled.

However, the question is whether the PDP can use all these potentials to constitute a formidable opposition to the governing APC, checkmate it, give it a good fight and possibly reposition strongly to stand a chance of taking over power from it in 2019? Since it is too early to understand and predict the new political direction in the country, answers to these questions can only be hypothetical.

As noted earlier, APC has no so much significant dominance over the PDP, but sooner or later it will get that dominance. The APC will get its dominance from future PDP’s misdoings and other events that will arise; PDP’s post-election crises is probably a sign of things to come. First of all, even in defeat, PDP seems unprepared to jettison its use and dump attitude complemented by brutal godfatherism, thereby creating more and more enemies for itself who continue operating and sabotaging it from within. It is expected that now without state power, this culture in PDP is likely to slow down and eventually stop, but the amount of damage it will do to the party before it stops may prove costly. The PDP subconsciously engineered its poor showing in the North and South-West thereby almost relegating itself to a regional party. It is very much unlikely that PDP can redeem its poor northern image in good time enough to checkmate APC’s forthcoming dominance. In the South-South and South-East where the PDP had a massive national following, it refused to allow the people to freely and fairly vote for their choices in local elections and the people are likely to punish it in potential bye-elections and in gubernatorial elections of Bayelsa, Edo and Anambra that will take place before 2019. One major setback for PDP is that the party is widely expected to lose big at all levels in the election tribunals. Before 2015, PDP had two strong annexed parties in APGA and Labour Party which have played very significant roles in PDP’s ‘winning’ of presidential elections. In what looked like suicidal, the PDP decided to kill and swallow the LP and has badly wounded the APGA and therefore now left with no other allies outside the main party. With its expected continuous decline, PDP will have it very difficult to win the gubernatorial elections in Ondo, Kogi and even Ekiti states. All these are factors that will weaken the PDP and strengthen the APC.

The PDP throughout its sixteen years had built itself around money, power and influence and 16 years is not 16 weeks. It will be very difficult if not almost impossible for the party to survive without these things unless they adjust extraordinarily. One to two years from now, the PDP will look more and more dilapidated, disorganized and most likely get disintegrated. This would be a very bad development for Nigerian politics. For many Nigerians who would like PDP to regroup and keep APC on its toes, they are more than likely to be disappointed. With a possible occurrence of this scenario, who then will checkmate APC?

The All Progressives’ Congress would from all indication dominate the Nigerian political landscape by mid-2016 up to probably early 2017, but anything after that cannot be easily predicted.

When APC becomes the dominant party in Nigeria, it is only normal that we get someone to checkmate its excesses. First, we need to determine how much checkmating does the APC require? It is very predictable that in matters within the sphere of Buhari’s direct influence, APC will require little or no checkmating at all. This is because it is simply unthinkable that Buhari will deliberately allow things he can directly control to go out of order and it is unimaginable that the new President will sacrifice his life-long integrity by allowing people directly under his control to mess up without dealing with them. However, any other APC issue outside Buhari’s direct influence cannot be trusted to be significantly different to that of PDP. For instance, one cannot bet against the new National Assembly under the APC to continue ‘business as usual’, we can’t bet against the APC Governors to continue along the tyrannical and autocratic line of most Nigerian Governors since 1999; as party leaders, the party had officially equipped its governors to run the state chapters of the party almost like their personal properties. One may not expect APC Local Government Chairmen and other officials not to abuse office and one also cannot trust the APC party officials to conduct free, fair and credible primaries at all levels as well as running the party transparently without favouritism, nepotism and corruption. Now that it has power, can we rule out the advancement of godfatherism, candidate imposition, money politics and other undemocratic practices into new levels within APC?

If APC needs checkmating and the PDP may not be able to do that, who else can? Buhari alone can be trusted to checkmate between 15 to 30% of the APC’s excesses. If he can firmly control his government and ensure strict adherence to discipline and due process, some few APC organs may fall in line. Secondly, it may be possible that APC may checkmate itself depending on how events turn out. This is because; the party is an amalgamation of different seemingly incompatible groups whose main objective was to win elections. Cracks are likely to occur and the party may break into factions, this may start from the unhealed wounds that could be created from the election of National Assembly Principal Officers. These cracks may widen beyond redemption especially in the states where the governors are likely to continue with their dictatorial tendencies. The fiercest opposition to the party and its leadership is likely to come from within and by the next convention meant to elect the leaders of the party in 2018, the final straw may have broken the camel’s back, with only the presidency as the source of unity and inspiration for all the warring factions of the party.

Presently, it is reported that some political stakeholders have started making underground efforts to come up with a third powerful alternative party to APC and PDP and they are determined to start work as early as late 2015 to early 2016. Part of their plan is to accommodate all the previously deregistered political parties and some interested existing ones into one large group. If this effort leads to fruition, coupled with determination and good leadership by the right people, then that new party may be backed by Nigerians to give the APC a good fight before and in 2019.

All these hypotheses aside, independent socio-online media activist are most certain to become the group that will give APC the biggest fight and the most significant checkmating of its life. If we recall, this group played one of the most significant role in kicking Jonathan and PDP out of Aso Rock. The majority of the Nigerian conventional mainstream media is likely to remain divided and in many cases profit-minded ahead of 2019, just as it was during the height of the Buhari-Jonathan campaign. Socio-online media activists, patriots, nationalists and bloggers have come to stay in Nigeria and they are likely to become stronger, more formal and more effective especially with the renewed confidence and sense of accomplishment that they now have from the 2015 elections. If APC is not careful, this group, that gave it one of its most significant supports into Aso Rock, would be the same to sack it out of it.

 ©2015: abdulazeezamir@hotmail.com

FOR THE RECORD: President Buhari's Acceptance and Inaugral Speeches


THE DIE IS CAST: ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT BY GENERAL MUHAMMADU BUHARI, GCFR, PRESIDENT-ELECT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA ON 1st, APRIL 2015

I am immensely grateful to God for this day and for this hour. I feel truly honoured and humbled that the Nigerian people have so clearly chosen me to lead them. The official announcement from INEC was the moment the vast majority of Nigerians had hoped and been waiting for. Today, history has been made, and change has finally come. Your votes have changed our national destiny for the good of all Nigerians.

INEC has announced that I, Muhammadu Buhari, shall be your next president. My team and I shall faithfully serve you. There shall no longer be a ruling party again: APC will be your governing party. We shall faithfully serve you. We shall never rule over the people as if they were subservient to government.

Our long night has passed and the daylight of new democratic governance has broken across the land. This therefore is not a victory for one man or even one party. It is a victory for Nigeria and for all Nigerians. Millions of you have worked for this day. So many have risked life and livelihood; and others have died that we may witness this moment.

And it is with a very heavy heart that I report many deaths and injuries amidst the jubilations yesterday. We send our sincere condolences to the families and friends of those who lost their lives; and wish speedy recovery to those who suffered injuries. I appeal to all our supporters to celebrate this victory with prayers and reflection instead of wild jubilation.

May the souls of those who died rest in peace. Let us take a moment of silence to honour all of those whose sacrifices have brought us to this fine and historic hour. As the results of the election have shown, their labour has not been and will never be in vain. Democracy and the rule of law will be re-established in the land.

Let us put the past, especially the recent past, behind us. We must forget our old battles and past grievances—and learn to forge ahead. I assure you that our government is one that will listen to and embrace all.

I pledge myself and our in-coming administration to just and principled governance. There shall be no bias against or favouritism for any Nigerian based on ethnicity, religion, region, gender or social status. I pledge myself and the government to the rule of law, in which none shall be so above the law that they are not subject to its dictates, and none shall be so below it that they are not availed of its protection.

You shall be able to go to bed knowing that you are safe and that your constitutional rights remain in safe hands. You shall be able to voice your opinion without fear of reprisal or victimization. My love and concern for this nation and what I desire for it extends to all, even to those who do not like us or our politics. You are all my people and I shall treat every one of you as my own. I shall work for those who voted for me as well as those who voted against me and even for those who did not vote at all. We all live under one name as one nation: we are all Nigerians.

Some unfortunate issues about my eligibility have been raised during the campaign. I wish to state that through devotion to this nation, everything I have learned and done has been to enable me to make the best possible contribution to public life. If I had judged myself incapable of governing I would never have sought to impose myself on it. I have served in various capacities and have always put in my best.

But despite the rancour of the elections, I extend a hand of friendship and conciliation to President Jonathan and his team. I hereby wish to state that I harbour no ill will against anyone.

Let me state clearly that President Jonathan has nothing to fear from me. Although we may not agree on the methods of governing the nation, he is a great Nigerian and still our president. He deserves our support and permanent respect by virtue of the office he has held.

This is how an honourable nation treats its servants and conducts its affairs; and this is how Nigeria should be.

I look forward to meeting with President Jonathan in the days to come to discuss how our teams can make the transition of administrations as efficient as possible.

Here, I want to thank my party for selecting me as its candidate. I thank our party leaders and members for the steadfast contributions they made to bring our dream to fruition. I thank INEC, the police and all other government agencies for performing their tasks in a proper manner and for refusing to be induced to undermine the election and the democratic process.

I also wish to thank religious Leaders, traditional leaders, the media, labour unions, Civil Society organisations, organised private sector, youths and students for their roles in this election.

I give special thanks to President Obama and his timely intervention and support for peaceful and credible elections in Nigeria and for sending Secretary John Kerry and other United States officials. The European Union – especially the United Kingdom, France, Germany and other nations that were actively involved in ensuring the success of this election are equally appreciated. My sincere thanks to the United Nations Secretary General Mr Ban-Ki Moon. The Commonwealth, China, India and other Asian and Gulf states are also hereby appreciated.

Finally our brothers in the African Union and ECOWAS have truly and clearly shown and demonstrate their commitment to our democratisation process. Former Presidents John Kuffour, Amos Sawyer, Bakili Muluzi and his team are well appreciated. I must also add my appreciation for the role played by civil societies, national and International observers, other world leaders in ensuring that Nigeria holds free and fair elections.

I assure all foreign governments that Nigeria will become a more forceful and constructive player in the global fight against terrorism and in other matters of collective concern, such as the fight against drugs, climate change, financial fraud, communicable diseases and other issues requiring global response. I want to assure our fellow African nations that Nigeria will now stand as a more constructive

partner in advancing the matters of concern to our continent, particularly with regard to economic development and eradication of poverty.

Former Heads of State and Presidents Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, General Yakubu Gowon, Alh. Shehu Shagari, General Ibrahim Babangida, Chief Ernest Shonekan and General Abdulsalami Abubakar deserve commendations for their statesmanship and words of caution and counsel for peace during the tense moments of this electoral period.

Most of all, I thank the people of Nigeria for reposing their confidence in me at this trying moment. Our nation wrestles many challenges including insecurity, corruption, economic decline. I pledge to give you my best in tackling these problems.

The good people of Nigeria, your obligation does not end with casting your ballot. I seek your voice and input as we tackle these problems.

This will not be a government democratic only in form. It will be a government democratic in substance and in how it interacts with its own people.

No doubt, this nation has suffered greatly in the recent past, and its staying power has been tested to its limits by crises, chief among which is insurgency of the Boko Haram. There is no doubt that in tackling the insurgency we have a tough and urgent job to do. But I assure you that Boko Haram will soon know the strength of our collective will and commitment to rid this nation of terror, and bring back peace and normalcy to all the affected areas. We shall spare no effort until we defeat terrorism.
Furthermore, we shall strongly battle another form of evil that is even worse than terrorism—the evil of corruption. Corruption attacks and seeks to destroy our national institutions and character. By misdirecting into selfish hands funds intended for the public purpose, corruption distorts the economy and worsens income inequality. It creates a class of unjustly-enriched people.

Such an illegal yet powerful force soon comes to undermine democracy because its conspirators have amassed so much money that they believe they can buy government. We shall end this threat to our economic development and democratic survival. I repeat that corruption will not be tolerated by this administration; and it shall no longer be allowed to stand as if it is a respected monument in this nation.

I ask you to join me in resolving these and the other challenges we face. Along the way, there will be victories but there may also be setbacks. Mistakes will be made. But we shall never take you for granted; so, be rest assured that our errors will be those of compassion and commitment not of wilful neglect and indifference.

We shall correct that which does not work and improve that which does. We shall not stop, stand or idle. We shall, if necessary crawl, walk and run to do the job you have elected us to do.
I realise that the expectation of our people today is as high as their commitment to change has been strong and their belief in us unshaken. While we pledge to begin doing our best without delay, we would like to appeal to them to appreciate the gravity of our situation, so that we become more realistic in our expectations.

We will govern for you and in your interests. Your vote was not wasted.

This is not the first time Nigerians have cast their votes for us, and this is not the first time they have been counted; but this is the first time that the votes have been allowed to count. With the help of God, we pledge to do our utmost to bring forth the Nigeria you seek.

Thank you for your patience and attention.

GENERAL MUHAMMADU BUHARI, GCFR
PRESIDENT-ELECT
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA




INAUGURAL SPEECH BY HIS EXCELLENCY, PRESIDENT MUHAMMADU BUHARI FOLLOWING HIS SWEARING-IN AS PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA ON 29TH MAY, 2015

I am immensely grateful to God Who Has preserved us to witness this day and this occasion. Today marks a triumph for Nigeria and an occasion to celebrate her freedom and cherish her democracy. Nigerians have shown their commitment to democracy and are determined to entrench its culture. Our journey has not been easy but thanks to the determination of our people and strong support from friends abroad we have today a truly democratically elected government in place.

I would like to thank President Goodluck Jonathan for his display of statesmanship in setting a precedent for us that has now made our people proud to be Nigerians wherever they are. With the support and cooperation he has given to the transition process, he has made it possible for us to show the world that despite the perceived tension in the land we can be a united people capable of doing what is right for our nation. Together we co-operated to surprise the world that had come to expect only the worst from Nigeria. I hope this act of graciously accepting defeat by the outgoing President will become the standard of political conduct in the country.

I would like to thank the millions of our supporters who believed in us even when the cause seemed hopeless. I salute their resolve in waiting long hours in rain and hot sunshine to register and cast their votes and stay all night if necessary to protect and ensure their votes count and were counted. I thank those who tirelessly carried the campaign on the social media. At the same time, I thank our other countrymen and women who did not vote for us but contributed to make our democratic culture truly competitive, strong and definitive.

I thank all of you.

Having just a few minutes ago sworn on the Holy Book, I intend to keep my oath and serve as President to all Nigerians.

I belong to everybody and I belong to nobody.

A few people have privately voiced fears that on coming back to office I shall go after them. These fears are groundless. There will be no paying off old scores. The past is prologue.

Our neighbours in the Sub-region and our African brethenen should rest assured that Nigeria under our administration will be ready to play any leadership role that Africa expects of it. Here I would like to thank the governments and people of Cameroon, Chad and Niger for committing their armed forces to fight Boko Haram in Nigeria.

I also wish to assure the wider international community of our readiness to cooperate and help to combat threats of cross-border terrorism, sea piracy, refugees and boat people, financial crime, cyber crime, climate change, the spread of communicable diseases and other challenges of the 21st century.
At home we face enormous challenges. Insecurity, pervasive corruption, the hitherto unending and seemingly impossible fuel and power shortages are the immediate concerns. We are going to tackle them head on. Nigerians will not regret that they have entrusted national responsibility to us. We must not succumb to hopelessness and defeatism. We can fix our problems.

In recent times Nigerian leaders appear to have misread our mission. Our founding fathers, Mr Herbert Macauley, Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Alhaji Ahmadu Bello, the Sardauna of Sokoto, Alhaji Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, Malam Aminu Kano, Chief J.S. Tarka, Mr Eyo Ita, Chief Denis Osadeby, Chief Ladoke Akintola and their colleagues worked to establish certain standards of governance. They might have differed in their methods or tactics or details, but they were united in establishing a viable and progressive country. Some of their successors behaved like spoilt children breaking everything and bringing disorder to the house.

Furthermore, we as Nigerians must remind ourselves that we are heirs to great civilizations: Shehu Othman Dan fodio’s caliphate, the Kanem Borno Empire, the Oyo Empire, the Benin Empire and King Jaja’s formidable domain. The blood of those great ancestors flow in our veins. What is now required is to build on these legacies, to modernize and uplift Nigeria.

Daunting as the task may be it is by no means insurmountable. There is now a national consensus that our chosen route to national development is democracy. To achieve our objectives we must consciously work the democratic system. The Federal Executive under my watch will not seek to encroach on the duties and functions of the Legislative and Judicial arms of government. The law enforcing authorities will be charged to operate within the Constitution. We shall rebuild and reform the public service to become more effective and more serviceable. We shall charge them to apply themselves with integrity to stabilize the system.

For their part the legislative arm must keep to their brief of making laws, carrying out over-sight functions and doing so expeditiously. The judicial system needs reform to cleanse itself from its immediate past. The country now expects the judiciary to act with dispatch on all cases especially on corruption, serious financial crimes or abuse of office. It is only when the three arms act constitutionally that government will be enabled to serve the country optimally and avoid the confusion all too often bedeviling governance today.

Elsewhere, relations between Abuja and the States have to be clarified if we are to serve the country better. Constitutionally there are limits to powers of each of the three tiers of government but that should not mean the Federal Government should fold its arms and close its eyes to what is going on in the states and local governments. Not least the operations of the Local Government Joint Account. While the Federal Government cannot interfere in the details of its operations it will ensure that the gross corruption at the local level is checked. As far as the constitution allows me I will try to ensure that there is responsible and accountable governance at all levels of government in the country. For I will not have kept my own trust with the Nigerian people if I allow others abuse theirs under my watch.

However, no matter how well organized the governments of the federation are they cannot succeed without the support, understanding and cooperation of labour unions, organized private sector, the press and civil society organizations. I appeal to employers and workers alike to unite in raising productivity so that everybody will have the opportunity to share in increased prosperity. The Nigerian press is the most vibrant in Africa. My appeal to the media today - and this includes the social media – is to exercise its considerable powers with responsibility and patriotism.

My appeal for unity is predicated on the seriousness of the legacy we are getting into. With depleted foreign reserves, falling oil prices, leakages and debts the Nigerian economy is in deep trouble and will require careful management to bring it round and to tackle the immediate challenges confronting us, namely; Boko Haram, the Niger Delta situation, the power shortages and unemployment especially among young people. For the longer term we have to improve the standards of our education. We have to look at the whole field of medicare. We have to upgrade our dilapidated physical infrastructure.

The most immediate is Boko Haram’s insurgency. Progress has been made in recent weeks by our security forces but victory cannot be achieved by basing the Command and Control Centre in Abuja. The command centre will be relocated to Maiduguri and remain until Boko Haram is completely subdued. But we cannot claim to have defeated Boko Haram without rescuing the Chibok girls and all other innocent persons held hostage by insurgents.

This government will do all it can to rescue them alive. Boko Haram is a typical example of small fires causing large fires. An eccentric and unorthodox preacher with a tiny following was given posthumous fame and following by his extra judicial murder at the hands of the police. Since then through official bungling, negligence, complacency or collusion Boko Haram became a terrifying force taking tens of thousands of lives and capturing several towns and villages covering swathes of Nigerian sovereign territory.

Boko Haram is a mindless, godless group who are as far away from Islam as one can think of. At the end of the hostilities when the group is subdued the Government intends to commission a sociological study to determine its origins, remote and immediate causes of the movement, its sponsors, the international connexions to ensure that measures are taken to prevent a recurrence of this evil. For now the Armed Forces will be fully charged with prosecuting the fight against Boko haram. We shall overhaul the rules of engagement to avoid human rights violations in operations. We shall improve operational and legal mechanisms so that disciplinary steps are taken against proven human right violations by the Armed Forces.

Boko Haram is not only the security issue bedevilling our country. The spate of kidnappings, armed robberies, herdsmen/farmers clashes, cattle rustlings all help to add to the general air of insecurity in our land. We are going to erect and maintain an efficient, disciplined people – friendly and well – compensated security forces within an over – all security architecture.

The amnesty programme in the Niger Delta is due to end in December, but the Government intends to invest heavily in the projects, and programmes currently in place. I call on the leadership and people in these areas to cooperate with the State and Federal Government in the rehabilitation programmes which will be streamlined and made more effective. As ever, I am ready to listen to grievances of my fellow Nigerians. I extend my hand of fellowship to them so that we can bring peace and build prosperity for our people.

No single cause can be identified to explain Nigerian’s poor economic performance over the years than the power situation. It is a national shame that an economy of 180 million generates only 4,000MW, and distributes even less. Continuous tinkering with the structures of power supply and distribution and close on $20b expanded since 1999 have only brought darkness, frustration, misery, and resignation among Nigerians. We will not allow this to go on. Careful studies are under way during this transition to identify the quickest, safest and most cost-effective way to bring light and relief to Nigerians.

Unemployment, notably youth un-employment features strongly in our Party’s Manifesto. We intend to attack the problem frontally through revival of agriculture, solid minerals mining as well as credits to small and medium size businesses to kick – start these enterprises. We shall quickly examine the best way to revive major industries and accelerate the revival and development of our railways, roads and general infrastructure.

Your Excellencies, My fellow Nigerians I can not recall when Nigeria enjoyed so much goodwill abroad as now. The messages I received from East and West, from powerful and small countries are indicative of international expectations on us. At home the newly elected government is basking in a reservoir of goodwill and high expectations. Nigeria therefore has a window of opportunity to fulfill our long – standing potential of pulling ourselves together and realizing our mission as a great nation.

Our situation somehow reminds one of a passage in Shakespeare’s Julius Ceasar:
“There is a tide in the affairs of men which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life, Is bound in shallows and miseries.”

We have an opportunity. Let us take it.

Thank you

MUHAMMADU BUHARI, GCFR
PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER IN-CHIEF-OF THE ARMED FORCES,

FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA 

Saturday, April 18, 2015

10 Things We Have to Do Before the 2019 Elections

17th April, 2015

Professor Attahiru Jega

By: Amir Abdulazeez

N
igeria is a nation that is famous for taking one step forward and then two or more steps backwards. Whenever one step is taken in the right direction, several other steps would be taken in the wrong one. This is probably one of the major reasons why we have failed to make a lasting and permanent progress in a lot of things.

A general belief in Nigeria and beyond is that the 1999 elections were credible with a high degree of legitimacy not because they were very free and fair (allegedly due to the military government’s interest in handing over to Obasanjo and PDP), but because they were ascertained to be largely a reflection of the peoples’ will. If we had built on the 1999 success in 2003 and 2007, probably we wouldn’t have found ourselves in the present situation whereby a mere acceptance of defeat is seen as heroism.

While the 2003 elections were believed to be possibly the worst elections in Nigeria’s recent history, the 2007 elections according to many local and international observers, could not pass the test of the minimum requirements for an average African election. Many opinions have declared that there were no elections in most parts of Nigeria in 2007.

The 2011 elections were by far better than those of 2003, but they fell short of those in 1999 in terms of credibility and acceptance. Despite their shortcomings, the 2011 elections represented a remarkable improvement and they laid a good foundation for the successful elections in 2015.
Many Nigerians believed that the 2015 elections were as good as near-perfect simply because the ruling party lost woefully. However, in reality, they were marred by serious irregularities and manipulations, only that the irregularities fell short of subverting the peoples’ will.

It is important to note that the role of credible elections in a democracy cannot be overemphasized. Both the 1999 and 2015 elections are probably not as credible as the annulled June 12, 1993 elections-believed to be the freest and fairest elections in Nigeria’s history. However, if we are to keep improving and edging closer to electoral perfection, we must build on the 2015 success. Some of the ways to do that is by doing the following things ahead of 2019;


De-registration of ‘Brief-Case’ Political Parties;
While winning elections is not the only function of political parties across the world, in Nigeria it seems to be the determining factor not only for recognition but for meaningful existence. With the general lack of ideological basis in the Nigerian Political Party System, only winning elections can be used to determine the strength of the political parties. For instance, the APC may be ruling Imo and Borno State, but almost nothing in terms of policies will show that the two states are being ruled by the same party.

Where any of the parties is lucky to have a hard working elected public office holder, his performance will translate to the success of that party and the party would be seen to have performed well in that state, seat or office. Base on this, all those brief-case political parties (who may never win any election in the next 50 years) that contributed in adding to the length of our ballot papers thereby confusing the electorates leading to high amount of invalid votes must be de-registered latest by the end of 2016 when all cases in the election petitions tribunals might have been settled. Strict registration procedures must also be put in place to discourage any non-serious party from resurfacing.

Available results of the 2015 elections a released by INEC suggests that only 8 parties managed to win at least one seat and they are; All Progressives’ Congress (APC), Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP), All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA), Labour Party (LP), Accord Party (AP), Peoples’ Democratic Movement (PDM), Peoples’ Progressive Alliance (PPA) and Social Democratic Party (SDP). While two-party system may limit the options of Nigerians, 8 parties are more than enough, we do not need 30 or 40 useless parties.

Election Tribunals Must Ensure Justice;
Many election outcomes across the country would surely be contested in courts. Media reports suggests that no less than 100 genuine and serious cases ranging from governorship, senatorial, house of representatives and state house of assembly elections would be filed in courts nationwide. The figure could be between 200 and 350 especially if we consider the fact that even candidates with no strong cases would still want to try their luck in court.

Elections are not perfect, that is why we have election tribunals and their duty is to ensure speedy justice. Justice must not be delayed because it is totally unfair and unacceptable for someone to continue sitting on an illegal or stolen mandate for long just because the tribunals are dragging the case for whatever reason.

Before the elections, multiple alarms of foul play have been raised in different quarters and during the course of the elections, many candidates have complained of rigging, violence, manipulation and oppression, but all INEC could do was to tell them to head to court if they were not satisfied. Therefore, it is the duty of the election tribunals to rescue the people from being governed through illegal mandates in various capacities. We have had enough of people serving out stolen two terms of 8-years in the last 12 years.

It is believed that, if the aggrieved candidates can present a good case with evidence and the courts will respond by doing a good job, many parliamentary and even governorship elections would be overturned. The courts must hear every case base on merit and should not dismiss any on flimsy technical grounds. Candidates who could prove beyond reasonable doubt that they won elections should be declared winners instead of wasting government funds by ordering for re-runs.

Many are likely to escape with illegal mandates due to their good lawyers, but all in all, the tribunals must not record a success rate of below 75%. Candidates with no serious cases can help by staying away from the tribunals and allow them to deal with serious ones. The success of the courts would determine the future confidence level of people in the judicial-electoral process. If the courts do not prove to be a solution, people will resort to winning elections at all cost to avoid going to courts.

Jega’s Reforms in INEC have to be sustained;

Professor Attahiru Jega has according to media reports made it clear that he is not accepting a renewal when his tenure ends in June. Jega has re-invented and re-shaped INEC through a set of reforms and innovations which his successor should sustain. He had laid a solid foundation for others to build upon. In building such foundation, he had to sacrifice the 2011 elections for the lasting success of forthcoming elections. Jega took over INEC in 2010 when elections were around the corner, but many expected him to reform the electoral body and conduct a unanimously acceptable election at the same time. However, few knew it was not practically possible. Jega managed to carry out some reforms and conducted an improved election in line with such reforms in 2011.

The introduction of the card readers and the sanitization of the accreditation and voting processes have helped in no small measure towards making the whole system credible. The next INEC Chairman should take us closer to electronic voting or even there by 2019.

All Elections between 2015 and 2019 should be Well Conducted;
Let us note that between 2015 and 2019, there will be governorship elections in Kogi, Bayelsa, Ondo, Edo, Anambra, Ekiti and Osun States. It is the conduct of elections in these seven states that will determine our optimism or pessimism on the 2019 General Elections. The Federal Government, INEC and all stakeholders must make sure that these elections record a remarkable improvement upon the 2015 elections with a success rate of between 85 to 95 %. The more we have credible elections, the better for the system.

Political party bigwigs and champions must jettison the habit of relocating to a state where elections are holding with the aim of winning it for their party at all cost. Let the people in every state determine what they want without external interference.

The elections tribunal are likely to annul a handful of elections and order for re-runs. Such re-runs or bye-elections must be conducted freely, fairly, peacefully and creditably.

Election Fraudsters and Offenders Must Face the Law;

Election riggers are never punished in Nigeria; even if the court settles a case, it only awards victory to the petitioner or orders for a re-run, it never punishes anyone. This is the reason behind the brazen impunity in our electoral system as people rig without being afraid of any consequences. May be this is due to the shortcomings of the Electoral Act; future Electoral Acts must come hard on riggers.

Before we amend the Electoral Act, perpetrators of different electoral crimes in the last elections must not be allowed to get away with it. The in-coming or even the out-going Federal Government should set up a panel under the Attorney General to investigate election riggings, violence, fraud, under age voting and vote buying, so that those found guilty should be immediately prosecuted.

Whenever one sees long voter queues comprising of women, poor, old, disabled and other weak people; one feels like advocating the death sentence for election riggers.

Politics must be De-Commercialized;

Nigerian politics seems to be only for the rich people or for people backed by godfathers with big purses. This is because many Nigerians are money worshipers and also politics has been turned into a big commercial and lucrative industry. This is why we witnessed excessive use of money to buy party nominations in all our elections from 2003 to date.

This anomaly is likely to continue unabated up to 2019 unless everyone decides to change. Federal, state and local governments must cut governance cost and make political appointments less attractive and lucrative. Political parties must significantly cut down the price of nomination forms and ban the use of money in party primaries and disqualify any candidate that violates. Law enforcement agencies must arrest politicians who spend more than what the Electoral Act stipulates during electioneering. Above all, citizens must stop worshiping corrupt politicians, stop selling their votes and demand nothing but service and accountability from elected officials.

INEC be made more Independent and Should Conduct LG Elections;

In the build-up to the 2015 elections, INEC’s independence was seriously threatened.  The electoral body was appeared to be bullied into accepting some decisions of the Presidency and Service Chiefs. The law has mandated INEC to fully take charge of election issues and the law must be respected and unless in emergency and unavoidable cases, no one should directly or indirectly dictate to INEC what it should do or not. Adequate legislation must be put in place to ensure complete independence of INEC and ensure that such independence is protected.

INEC’s mandate should be constitutionally extended to allow it conduct local government elections. State ‘Independent’ Electoral Commissions have been conducting nonsense in the name of local government elections since 2003. The last time we had meaningful local government elections was in 1999 when they were conducted by INEC. State governors have proven their lack of patriotism by organizing and executing fraudulent local government elections over the years and nothing in sight suggests that they are going to change. Therefore, to save the local councils, proper elections must be conducted by INEC uniformly across the country.


Level Playing Ground Should be Created;

Many a time we confuse elections to mean voting only. Voting is only one out of many activities that make up an election. Election is a process that starts right from candidate nominations, campaigns, up to settlement of petitions in election tribunals. Right from 1999 to date, we have never had a level playing ground for all parties and candidates at different stages of the election process.

Parties in power stand to enjoy many privileges and benefits. For instance, the ruling party monopolises the usage of state-owned media at little or no cost and apparently deny the opposition the use of such.  A sitting president controls the security forces to his own electoral advantage or that of his party. He uses government-owned and maintained jets for all his campaigns while the opposition would have to hire jets or alternatively ply the dangerous roads across the country for their campaigns. Incumbents have unrestricted access to campaign grounds while opposition are made to undergo many bureaucratic processes before they have a simple permission to use a venue. The federal and state governments together with the national and state parliaments must put in place adequate measures to ensure that all candidates irrespective of their parties are treated equally. Incumbents must not enjoy too much advantage over his opponents.

Nigerian electorates seem not to be well motivated either due to lack of confidence or interest in the electoral process and governance or due to hard voting conditions; hence, we have witnessed huge voter apathy in recent years. Only consistent free and fair elections, leadership accountability and good governance can revive the interest and confidence of Nigerians in government.

Another important issue is that of the bandwagon effect in Nigerian elections which is very dangerous. Many candidates were not elected base on their own merits but because their elections were conducted the same time with candidates who seem to be the peoples’ choice. Incompetent and less competent candidates have benefitted from the bandwagon effect, just as competent candidates became victims. Future elections should be conducted separately in an order which the bandwagon effect will have little or no influence.

Candidates should Emerge by Popular will;

The most popular aspirants usually lose in the party primaries probably because they don’t have money or godfathers, leaving voters to elect between bad choices or for whomever candidates the party primaries produce for them in the general elections.

Nigerian political parties must think of ways through which candidates would emerge through popular will of the people and not through the narrow interests of few people. In the last elections APC’s modified indirect primaries saw only 6,008 delegates select a Presidential Candidate for more than 170 million people while PDP used about 3000 delegates to vote for just one contender. Also, 21 delegates were alleged to have determined the PDP gubernatorial candidate for the whole of Yobe State.

If candidates emerge by popular will, the people will have little problem with whomever emerges victorious in the general elections as all the party candidates were initially determined by the people.


APC Must Lead by Example;

The All Progressives Congress is the new ruling party with enormous influence and goodwill across the country. APC should not be preoccupied with governing Nigeria only; it should also concentrate on reforming our political system. If APC wants to make history, this is the best opportunity.

From 1999 to date, the PDP had introduced many things into our political system, most of which did more harm than good. PDP introduced the Party Board of Trustees (A body whose function is largely mysterious and appears to weaken the main leadership of the party), zoning of positions which caused many divisions among Nigerians and did a lot of damage to competency, candidate impositions, undemocratic consensus in the election of party officials, encouraging party cross-carpeting, position of party leader-who appears to be even above the party constitution. All these were negative inventions which the APC also embraced and unfortunately institutionalized some of them.

The APC must immediately make a self-assessment and make necessary amendments; let this victory not get into its head. APC must champion the cause of ideology in Nigerian political party system, internal democracy, building strong parties, party supremacy, accountability and good governance, etc. If the ruling party behaves properly, all other parties trying to unseat it in 2019 will be left with no option than to follow suit.

©2015: abdulazeezamir@hotmail.com